Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Unusual quality checklist"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 22:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC) | ::Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 22:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | I believe we should clean this list up and remove all items that can't be unusual, similar to the vintage and genuine lists. A second list with non unusual items can be created if needed and linked. | + | I believe we should clean this list up and remove all items that can't be unusual, similar to the vintage and genuine lists. A second list with non unusual items can be created if needed and linked. [[User:Sqq xing|kenny]] 07:44, 11 November 2011 (PST) |
Revision as of 15:44, 11 November 2011
A "Used To be" key
Should there be a "used to be" symbol added, seeing as how the Blighted Beak and Le Party Phantom could have been unusual only if received before the change to misc. -= M-NINJA 
=- 21:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- How about this thing?
-= M-NINJA =- 22:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. —
Moussekateer·talk 22:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. —
I believe we should clean this list up and remove all items that can't be unusual, similar to the vintage and genuine lists. A second list with non unusual items can be created if needed and linked. kenny 07:44, 11 November 2011 (PST)
