Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pomson 6000"
(→TFC Railgun: new section) |
(→TFC Railgun) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== TFC Railgun == | == TFC Railgun == | ||
− | When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC | + | When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC [[Railgun_(Classic)]] for the engineer, although the only aspects it retains are: |
− | |||
*Is a non explosive projectile weapon | *Is a non explosive projectile weapon | ||
*Doesn't use conventional ammo | *Doesn't use conventional ammo | ||
So the relation is slim at best.[[User:Nintyuk|Nintyuk]] 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST) | So the relation is slim at best.[[User:Nintyuk|Nintyuk]] 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST) |
Revision as of 18:03, 17 December 2011
This thing has the potential to completely change the metagame. I sincerely hope it doesn't work on people that are already ubered. Grug 23:55, 14 December 2011 (PST)
- The wiki is not a place to discuss this kind of stuff. Take it to the Steam Forums. – Cructo [T][C] 23:57, 14 December 2011 (PST)
- Hey, this sort of discussion about the game (rather than the wiki) would probably better suited for a forum like the official Steam User Forums. – fashnek (talk·c) 23:57, 14 December 2011 (PST)
Is it just me
I just realized that Pomson sounds similar to Template:W, which by the way, is very famous for submachine gun and stuff. We don't know well about this item yet, but could there be any correlation? --Herr Queso 12:07, 15 December 2011 (PST)
- "Blasting out rapid-succession pulses of cross-spectrum electromagnetic radiation, the Pomson has been shown to dissolve an Egyptian pyramid in four archeologically educational weeks or one of the smaller, slightly crappier Mayan ones in just under a fortnight." the item's design/function seems to be based on automatic weaponry. so yes. HyenaDip 12:19, 15 December 2011 (PST)
- I don't think it would be appropriate to note in the article unless you get confirmation from Greg Broadmore or the other folks at Weta Workshop. – fashnek (talk·c) 12:23, 15 December 2011 (PST)
- Thanks HyenaDip for confirming it :) and uh no I wasn't really asking about "should I add this to trivia". I was just asking for possibility of coorelation. and yes I clearly know it's really early for adding this. --Herr Queso 12:31, 15 December 2011 (PST)
I made this thing a few months back
The exact same model. The exact same weapon. I never finished it. Only thing it needed was a texture, and now it's officially in TF2. Whether Valve-made or contributed, I dunno, but it's there. Man oh man am I pissed. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Recurracy (talk) • (contribs) 08:13, 16 December 2011
- If it's any consolation, someone from Weta Workshop modeled it - I don't imagine they would even have been allowed to use a community-contributed one. Anyway, discussions like this are best kept on the forums. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 04:01, 16 December 2011 (PST)
TFC Railgun
When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC Railgun_(Classic) for the engineer, although the only aspects it retains are:
- Is a non explosive projectile weapon
- Doesn't use conventional ammo
So the relation is slim at best.Nintyuk 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST)