The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
i nominate tc_hydro a well written article explaining to the best of it's ability what this mode is about using video pictures and well organized sections on top of that the map's unique well thought out game mode needs to be recognizedAres5566 02:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I also feel it is a substantial and well written articles. It has plenty of pictures and videos, and it is intricate without being hard to read.Kevschow 02:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)(I'd swear i had the tildes. Sorry)
- Support I've always liked the map, and it would be good to help users to find new things to try out. Also, to the user above, please mark your posts with four tildes before posting. Renaman 14:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support One of the best maps in the game. High quality, and definitely deserves to be featured. Mortis 14:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very nice -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Considering that the majority of TF2 players haven't even heard of Team Fortress Classic, why not feature it? While the article IS a little short, it is an interesting read. --Stevoisiak 21:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah i agree with Stevosiak because Tfc is just an amazing game, without it there would be no tf2. THE3STOOGES 21:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support I was going to nominate the Main Page (Classic) when the entire classic became a little more complete. But, I suppose that TFC would make a great page also, to show where the TF2 empire came from. K-Mac (Talk | Contrib) 18:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Put This In! THE3STOOGES 00:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support It's always good to know the origin of a game you know and enjoy. Not only that but I found it a really informative article about Team Fortress and what it was like. - Lexar - talk 08:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support I also agree, it would be nice to see the page about the game that gave us TF fans many hours of enjoyment (and still does) back before the Source engine started to take shape. BaconIsTasty 9:34, June 16 2011 (UTC)
Seems like a very informative article to me, and is easy to read. Should it be featured? SnowCanary 21:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Seems good -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Disagree It's surely well written, but shouldn't we give the Spy a little break? The Backstab article was featured 'bout a month ago... Deveen [T][C] 18:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Just because this has seen support and has been nominated, does not mean that it will be featured next, just that it is added to the list of articles that may be featured in the future -- Firestorm 19:20, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
It's a pretty informative article that shows people what TF2 could of been. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 08:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Disagree Not really applicable at all -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Disagree Very low quality. Must be impoved to get even "not bad" status. SiPlus 10:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Also some info in the article is related to Valve's Team Fortress, not to Brotherhood of Arms. SiPlus 11:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
SUPPORT think we should have saxton hale as the featured article because its well laid out,complete and just looks nice.Plus Who doesn't like Saxton Hale? THE3STOOGES 00:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's already been featured. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Nope This has been featured already. Locked. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
This article is informative, includes images and charts, examples, links, adequate trivia, correct information, among other qualities. It certainly deserves to be featured. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. The information on how crits work is enough to get it in alone. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 00:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support. It's a cool article and meets the criteria. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- YES! Yeah Criticals hit page looks great,Put it in. THE3STOOGES 00:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Yep, lookin' good! -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support That Special Cases section looks like a box packed with all kinds of information until you stop and read it. I think this is pretty much the only issue, and it's not actually a problem. IMO the whole article is brilliant. And there are graphics - you can always trust those graphics! =] Deveen [T][C] 19:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Done Critical hits is now featured! – Epic Eric (T | C) 17:29, 4 July 2011 (PDT)
Just nominating. SiPlus 16:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Disagree Not really relevant -- Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
It's a bit short, and offers little more than a gallery of pretty pictures at the moment, but it's really one of my favorite articles. Links off to several weapons, maps, and classes. There's also a link to the posters article, which has those calenders on it. You know the ones. SilverHammer 20:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Disagree While nice, it really doesn't have much relevance. - Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Informative and well written. --Picard talk 21:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Agreed -- Firestorm 14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Definitely, an article thats interesting, informative, well written and up to date. - Lexar - talk 10:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Agreed, very good article and informative. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 20:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Nice! --SilverHammer 22:07, 4 August 2011 (PDT)
Featured! – Epic Eric (T | C) 10:11, 5 August 2011 (PDT)
On top of being a well filled-out article, it's also currently relevant. Community's a-buzz with talk of a Medic update. Whether it comes or not, people will still be interested. It's odd how many people you come across who don't know that Medic's from Stuttgart. SilverHammer 07:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Will probably feature this if/when Meet the Medic comes out, if that sounds good to everyone else! -- Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Running off what Firestorm said, I totally agree. So just a prediction, this will probably be Featured Article by the 21st. TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 07:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Update Medic is now our featured article!
— minip 03:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Informative, well-written and such a good map. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 23:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support I don't see why not. The 2Fort article is nicely written, and as probably the most iconic map in the game I think it deserves a spot on the main page. — Xenak (Talk|Contribs) 00:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm conflicted. On one side, it's 2fort, but on the other, it's a well written article. It's hard to measure out the good from the bad in this. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment It's not a matter of being iconic or a good map; it's a matter of being a greatly-written article. For instance, we have Dynamite Pack, a rather "hidden" article, and it became featured. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Support Well formatted, looks good -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe This seems to be a good article, as well as being a good map. However, at the time I am unsure of it's relevancy. TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 03:49, 7 July 2011 (PDT)
- Support Just came in from the article to nominate it here myself. It's a really darn good one. --SilverHammer 11:39, 8 August 2011 (PDT)
I nominate the Wrangler page, because it's awesome.
Hilarious Pill 11:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Informative, well detailed, and in a correct layout. Everything you need to know, really.--Focusknock 19:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Simply a great article. I approve. – Epic Eric (T | C) 19:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support FEATURE THIS BAD BOY! --Stevoisiak 18:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Well-formatted, I like it -- Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral I see nothing wrong with it, but nothing really exceptional either. Still, I don't mind giving Engie love at all.
- Support I like the weapon. Nothing bad about it and the page seems to be well formatted and in order. Impoxdragon 22:02, 14 August 2011 (PDT)
I nominate the Sandvich because it is well written, informative and would look great on the main page! Cloventt (Talk) (Contribs) 22:50, 27 June 2011 (PDT)
- Support Good article. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 15:56, 28 June 2011 (PDT)
- Support Very well written and has a lot of good information. SandeProElite 09:13, 7 July 2011 (PDT)
- Nom That means yes. --SilverHammer 22:12, 1 August 2011 (PDT)
- Support It's well-detailed and the first paragraph goes into hilarious detail about the contents of it. 17:15, 21 August 2011 (PDT)
- Nom Yes. MaxMan1300 14:10, 6 October 2011 (PDT)
I would like to nominate the Movies page. Why? Because it can kick your ass; I know it kicked mine. That's just how good it is. So why waste time listening to a mortal such as myself explain it? Check it out yourself. TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 03:48, 7 July 2011 (PDT)
- Support While your methods of nominating this article are.. questionable. It is a nice page to show off -- Firestorm 14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support It is indeed a good page. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:11, 23 June 2011 (PDT)
- Neutral Er. --SilverHammer 22:12, 1 August 2011 (PDT)
- Support Good page with a lot of great media. --_Sp3cTalk 21:10, 7 August 2011 (PDT)
- Neutral We already kind of... Well, y'know, LINK to the page on the front page of the Wiki. Not much need to feature it below said link. Triscuitable 20:07, 9 September 2011 (PDT)
- Support It is a very nice page. I'm ok with it.--RRaccoon99 19:52, 4 November 2011 (PDT)
Honestly surprised this wasn't already here. I was about to leave a note on the discussion page about how BEAUTIFUL it is. Whoever put it together... the Saxton in the quote, the "cover" links... It's just a beautiful article. Deserves to be seen. SilverHammer 01:32, 5 July 2011 (PDT)
- Definately agreed. I believe we have Aperture AI to thank for the design -- Firestorm 09:07, 7 July 2011 (PDT)
- Just to throw this out there; with that big Valve comic being released next month, I think it'd be a good excuse to feature this article, with the cover of that comic on the front page. --SilverHammer 22:02, 17 October 2011 (PDT)
- Support I was truly suprised this wasn't in the index. I'll support the full way. -- RRaccoon99 19:55, 4 November 2011 (PDT)
The preceding discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.