Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Unusual quality checklist"
(→A "Used To be" key) |
(→A "Used To be" key) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Hi to all, I'm updating this list on a REGULAR basis. I check often if new hats exist, and have updated a couple lately. Will keep doing this, its the best way I can help :D I have also been looking for more bugs. [[User:goldnuts]] | Hi to all, I'm updating this list on a REGULAR basis. I check often if new hats exist, and have updated a couple lately. Will keep doing this, its the best way I can help :D I have also been looking for more bugs. [[User:goldnuts]] | ||
| − | Good idea there to clean it up and separate "can't be unusual" into a section, and then its neater [[User:goldnuts]] | + | Good idea there to clean it up and separate "can't be unusual" into a section, and then its neater. Even better, why have "can drop" It does not drop this is about UNUSUALS. Drop or not means nothing here. Remove that entirely?? then you can have GREEN can be unusual RED not unusual, way way easier to understand the page. [[User:goldnuts]] |
Once hats are on the unusual list I think it is very unlikely they would come OFF the unusual list, but effect combinations might get stopped (like unboxing a burning slug might not be possible one day) [[User:goldnuts]] | Once hats are on the unusual list I think it is very unlikely they would come OFF the unusual list, but effect combinations might get stopped (like unboxing a burning slug might not be possible one day) [[User:goldnuts]] | ||
Revision as of 19:43, 9 January 2012
A "Used To be" key
Should there be a "used to be" symbol added, seeing as how the Blighted Beak and Le Party Phantom could have been unusual only if received before the change to misc. -= M-NINJA 
=- 21:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- How about this thing?
-= M-NINJA =- 22:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. —
Moussekateer·talk 22:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not really necessary, the tables just showing which hats can have that quality. Whether they can still be found or not is not that important I think, the information is on the relevant hat's article. —
I believe we should clean this list up and remove all items that can't be unusual, similar to the vintage and genuine lists. A second list with non unusual items can be created if needed and linked. kenny 07:44, 11 November 2011 (PST)
Hi to all, I'm updating this list on a REGULAR basis. I check often if new hats exist, and have updated a couple lately. Will keep doing this, its the best way I can help :D I have also been looking for more bugs. User:goldnuts
Good idea there to clean it up and separate "can't be unusual" into a section, and then its neater. Even better, why have "can drop" It does not drop this is about UNUSUALS. Drop or not means nothing here. Remove that entirely?? then you can have GREEN can be unusual RED not unusual, way way easier to understand the page. User:goldnuts
Once hats are on the unusual list I think it is very unlikely they would come OFF the unusual list, but effect combinations might get stopped (like unboxing a burning slug might not be possible one day) User:goldnuts
