Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medic match-ups"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::You're replying to something written nearly 1.5 years ago. The page has been revised since then (massive compressing of everything written, if I recall correctly). I do agree that although the tables look fancy, they really hinder what information can be placed. It's a big job, so... -- [[User:InShane|InShane]] 07:29, 30 January 2012 (PST) | ::You're replying to something written nearly 1.5 years ago. The page has been revised since then (massive compressing of everything written, if I recall correctly). I do agree that although the tables look fancy, they really hinder what information can be placed. It's a big job, so... -- [[User:InShane|InShane]] 07:29, 30 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::Thank you, I hadn't noticed that - Although I still feel the original statement applies. I'm no expert, so I don't know how exactly the table could be further improved, but I feel happier having raised the fact I think it does need improving. One major concern is that they allow no space for considering player or enemy loadouts. [[User:MCMackers|MCMackers]] 05:50, 7 February 2012 (PST) | :::Thank you, I hadn't noticed that - Although I still feel the original statement applies. I'm no expert, so I don't know how exactly the table could be further improved, but I feel happier having raised the fact I think it does need improving. One major concern is that they allow no space for considering player or enemy loadouts. [[User:MCMackers|MCMackers]] 05:50, 7 February 2012 (PST) | ||
+ | ::::As of now, I believe the Match-up pages are supposed to give basic advive regarding the class itself. The Anti-class pages cover enemy-specific weapons while Basic strategy covers player-specific weapons (but not specific loadouts, as there are too many combinations). But yeah, I'm not sure where the tables could be changed, either. I know that these Match-up pages have existed, in this format even before the wiki shifted to being official here. The pages themselves are iffy, given that TF2 is a team game, but shouldn't be deleted, as at the very least they cover counterpicks. -- [[User:InShane|InShane]] 07:57, 7 February 2012 (PST) |
Revision as of 15:57, 7 February 2012
Perhaps we could get a bigger section for each of the match-ups? This is a lot more strategy that can fit nicely into one of the boxes. Also maybe even some help with timing and movement from a pro battle medic could prove a good insightful page. - Meter1060 18:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree. The current table format does not allow for detailed descriptions or the discussion of different weapons. The current language of this page could also use a clean-up. There are too many references to a Medic Buddy. This page should be explaining how players can deal with enemy classes themselves. - MCMackers 06:03, 30 January 2012 (PST)
- You're replying to something written nearly 1.5 years ago. The page has been revised since then (massive compressing of everything written, if I recall correctly). I do agree that although the tables look fancy, they really hinder what information can be placed. It's a big job, so... -- InShane 07:29, 30 January 2012 (PST)
- Thank you, I hadn't noticed that - Although I still feel the original statement applies. I'm no expert, so I don't know how exactly the table could be further improved, but I feel happier having raised the fact I think it does need improving. One major concern is that they allow no space for considering player or enemy loadouts. MCMackers 05:50, 7 February 2012 (PST)
- As of now, I believe the Match-up pages are supposed to give basic advive regarding the class itself. The Anti-class pages cover enemy-specific weapons while Basic strategy covers player-specific weapons (but not specific loadouts, as there are too many combinations). But yeah, I'm not sure where the tables could be changed, either. I know that these Match-up pages have existed, in this format even before the wiki shifted to being official here. The pages themselves are iffy, given that TF2 is a team game, but shouldn't be deleted, as at the very least they cover counterpicks. -- InShane 07:57, 7 February 2012 (PST)
- Thank you, I hadn't noticed that - Although I still feel the original statement applies. I'm no expert, so I don't know how exactly the table could be further improved, but I feel happier having raised the fact I think it does need improving. One major concern is that they allow no space for considering player or enemy loadouts. MCMackers 05:50, 7 February 2012 (PST)
- You're replying to something written nearly 1.5 years ago. The page has been revised since then (massive compressing of everything written, if I recall correctly). I do agree that although the tables look fancy, they really hinder what information can be placed. It's a big job, so... -- InShane 07:29, 30 January 2012 (PST)