Talk:Community competitive play
| Talk archives | |
|
Archive 1 |
Move competitive map pages to the maps' community strategies?
Is there a reason why "MAP (competitive)" should exist? Shouldn't most of their content be at their respective community strategies? I suggest to move everything from competitive maps articles to the maps' community strategies? · Ashe (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Expanding this, I would say that a lot of info from competitive articles should be merged into community strategies. If competitive play is the optimal way of using a class or weapon or playing in a map, shouldn't they be part of them? I think competitive article were created due to the existence of random damage variance. Since it's gone, I say that we should do the merge · Ashe (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Some competitive maps differ from the official maps, which is probably why they were deemed notable as having their own map pages. I don't think competitive play is necessarily the most optimal way of using a class, as they are bound by restrictions such as whitelists and in the case of 6s, a whole different environment than Casual play. Although I do agree it should be on both where applicable.
GrampaSwood (talk) 10:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Some competitive maps differ from the official maps, which is probably why they were deemed notable as having their own map pages. I don't think competitive play is necessarily the most optimal way of using a class, as they are bound by restrictions such as whitelists and in the case of 6s, a whole different environment than Casual play. Although I do agree it should be on both where applicable.
