Talk:Item quality distribution
The Rimmed Raincatcher must be updated in this template to denote that it can exist with Unusual quality. This change was added as part of the Febuary 14, 2011 Patch. SnowCanary 17:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Beak and Phantom
Here it is stated that Unusual Beak/Phantom could only found previously. That is untrue, they can still very much be found! Benvil 08:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Merge
IMHO, we needn't so small article. It will be appropriate to merge it with Quality. These articles have the same theme. - Grand-O-Rand 22:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Support You beat me there. Shock394 18:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)- Support Yeah, this merge proposal looks right to me Cthulhu1992 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support I agree. Zoon-li 18:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Why not. -- Nightbox (t s) 09:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
No. They already were merged with that article at one point however we decided to split them for a few reasons, one that there is likely going to be more lists like this made and another being that we document the qualities themselves there. Not the items that "can" have them, since any item in the game can technically have any other quality. -- Lagg 
10:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)- Support Go ahead and merge it. On it own it feels really lacking, and since the lists are hidden by default they won't be in the way within the quality article. Ailure 12:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- No. I just gave the reasons the lists aren't in the article itself anymore, and this was not one of them. However it is also a valid reason because assuming a person has JS (what allows the lists to be hidden) enabled by default is not always a good idea on a wiki. -- Lagg 13:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support DO IT -
This is a really pointless page it's basically the same topic as quality but in a different way. This should really be on one page for reader convenience. 
- Lexar - talk 11:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Nope.avi A wiki is not designed primarily for reader convenience. I must make it clear that these lists were already part of the quality page at one time but were removed for the reasons I gave above. Please read them. -- Lagg 11:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
