Talk:Main Page

From Team Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 01:58, 10 October 2010 by TENAXIS (talk | contribs) (→‎We're first!)
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is for discussing elements and layout of the Main Page. For discussion relating to Team Fortress Wiki in general, please see the TF Wiki discussion page.
Current ongoing discussions
Discussion:  – Moves:  – Deletions:  – Open Review:  – Merges:  – Splits:  – Other:
v • e

Archives

Bots Link

Seems to me like bots should not be considered "Community" "Custom Content", or at least not anymore, and should be removed from that section, I think they should be placed in the "Game Info" "Content" section at the bottom of the main page instead, considering the fact that they are official, but I don't know how to edit the main page. Guy 13:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

True enough. I'll fix it later. -- Smashman... (t • s) 13:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Done. -The Neotank ( | Talk) User The Neotank Signeotank.gif 13:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

tf2wiki.net / wiki.teamfortress.com

Hello there, why are both the (original) tf2wiki and the new (official) wiki online? Will they co-exist or eventually merge? This confuses me a bit. Thanks --Lbbt 16:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

TF2Wiki was an independently-owned website that was created a few years ago. Valve officially back the creation of a new Wiki, and this one was created. It has the official support of Valve, better servers and no ads. The owner of TF2Wiki does not want to take his website down, and Valve does not seem interested in buying it out. --Firestorm 16:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
I did wonder why the Lumbricus Lid page was vague in one Firefox tab and comprehensive in the other, despite the same pagename; didn't note the full web-address. Everything else is exactly the same; I didn't know there were 2 wikis! So people should just update this one? JaffaCakeLover 10:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Pretty much, yeah. It seems the owner of the old wiki insists on keeping his site up for the ad revenue and is not really interested in maintaining its content any further. We, however, are constantly improving ours and now have official status and the support of Valve. :) seb26 [talk] 10:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

We're first!

Break out the champagne everyone, Google brings us up first in a search for "Team Fortress Wiki" --Firestorm 21:50, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Not for me. -- Pilk (talk) 22:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Nor me. But we are gaining.  – Smashman (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
It is for me too. Let's get some scrumpy and Pain Trains to drink! -- OluapPlayer (t) Howdy, pardner! 12:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
We're very close! Come on guys we can do this! --EvilDeadFan Pyro Blue Big.jpg 14:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

yeah but if you search tf2 wiki or teamfortress 2 wiki, the old one still comes up, that create problems

Should we make a Poker Night at the Inventory page?

Considering that the Heavy is in it, they made one over at the Sam and Max wiki, so I think it's just a good idea if we have one as well, besides, when the game comes out, it'll be fun to add trivia about the Heavy and how he plays cards(especially since Sasha's gonna be used)! :D --EvilDeadFan Pyro Blue Big.jpg 14:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

I like how they link the Heavy to this wiki.Also making such a page is not a bad idea. Mitko1239 14:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
As of right now, no Poker Night page. But it will definitely be mentioned on the Heavy page. If the Heavy has new Poker Night lines, I'll see what I can do with them and this Wiki. -- En Ex (talk) 11:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

New Main Page

I like it. Very good work guys. CANPoo 05:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm glad I had wonderful peons like Seb26 to do some of the grunt work or it would have taken FOREVER --Firestorm 05:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Why did you change it? CWalkthroughs 10:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
It was looking old and outdated and too similar to the unofficial wiki's to make us comfortable. Nice job, seb26!  – Smashman (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I like the new mainpage. Thank you :) --Joachimeberhard 23:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

And i personally do not like it. most interesting thing (patches and news line) is placed too low, huge-ass line of languages is quite a joke and that random site box is erm, not a good idea amigo. On 1280x1024 i have to scroll to read featured article, ergo first look fail. And colours are mad :( Ostrowiak 12:09, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Well that's your opinion, what do you mean by 'random site box'?  – Smashman (talk) 12:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Funky box of links below categories images (enginaahz sentry golden wrecz etc) Ostrowiak 14:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
wat CWalkthroughs 14:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

It's a good step in the right direction if anything. --Focusknock 14:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

IMO I think the entire Index/Featured Article and Latest Updates/Did you know... sections are a bit big. The entire front page of the wiki now requires me to scroll side to side to see everything. I recommend condensing that or make the sections themselves scrollable. That way I can just scroll the section instead of scrolling the entire page. --ANormalUsername 05:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

One request so that I can sleep at night without having nightmares of duck ghosts attacking me. Make the background color on the div the class images are on white instead of sickly-yellow. Lagg 01:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

You are having nightmares with Nineaxis? -- OluapPlayer (t) Howdy, pardner! 01:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this is about sickly-yellow, cause all I see is orange. -- Nineaxis Duck Gib.png 01:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
mp-content-header-alt is orange. This is sickly-yellow. Like an emoticon drowned in bleach. Lagg 01:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
He's talking about the background for each class' portrait --Firestorm 01:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
And it's a light orange, not yellow. -- Nineaxis Duck Gib.png 01:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hmm. I'll be honest, while I agree the old page could have used something to differentiate from the old wiki, and that a lot of the new stuff looks very polished and pretty. It is a bit messy to the eyes. It feels like too much is going on at once when you first plop on the homepage for the first time, and certain things could be a little more condensed.

Examples: The index is a welcome change, however the links below it do feel a little random and confusing somewhat visually, the updates are less condensed which can be seen as a good think OR a bad thing, and due to a lot of the negative changes, things like the "Did you know" or the "featured article" seem less necessary when they are no longer a focal point to the eye amongst the rest.

Still. It has only just recently surfaced, and as with any wiki, changes can be made. I do agree it is a good start though. :) -- Benjamuffin Om nom nom! 09:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Seb, you did a really good job. Right now, my only complaints are: 1) there are two links to the admin page right next to each other and 2) we gotta figure out a spot to put a link to the Team Fortress 2 article. So yeah, other than that, this looks pretty damn nifty! -- En Ex (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

I know I'm new, and users on this Wiki seem to have a not so strange dislike for all new users, but I think I'll prove myself valuable eventually. Anyway, a question: if I may be so bold, is there a reason why followed links appear grey on this site? It can make it a little difficult to tell if it is a link at all. Not a major concern, just a question.Subtlefuge 18:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I like the new main page a lot - just a suggestion though; maybe the Administrator link should be replaced with one to Non-player characters instead? Seems odd to give one NPC precedence when you've got others like Saxton Hale? Just a though - Goldenboy 11:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

The Steam Group is 1337

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/OTFWiki

Ohyeah. -- OluapPlayer (t) Howdy, pardner! 23:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I shall be 1338 Muhaha CANPoo 02:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Set Bonuses

Sorry, I'm a bit new to this right now, so I don't know if I'm doing this right in any way, but...

Perhaps we should make separate pages for each of the item set bonuses introduced in the Mann-Conomy update (as well as any additional ones patched in at a later date)? It seems rather unnoticeable at the moment, simply tacked on the hat pages. Randomscripter 18:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, but we already have the Item Sets page. We're probably going to link to it on the main page some time in the future, I think I might put it there now, actually --Firestorm 18:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh, alright. Just making sure. Randomscripter 20:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Has anyone else made this suggestion?

Most of the time I see a wiki like this, they often have a poll on their main page. It might be interesting to see the opinions of the community. Although some of the questions would probably seem trivial, it is fun to see how many people i.e. prefer to use stock weapons/think the Pyro should get a "Meet the" video before the Medic, has this idea been brought up before?--Karonen 20:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&oldid=118603"