User talk:Emrfish6

Well, i thought it would be useful to add the model path, so people wouldn't get lost while looking for it. But, if it's useless, then i'll stop...Titanium (talk) 23:21, 19 June 2013 (PDT)

Talk about Tyurtlenek

The original tyurtlenek had a paintable only in the neck part: http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/864955366450127947/1FD6266EE35F9AFD971370B741393B9A199C532F/

The current tyurtlenek in-game paints the whole shirt, that's why I decided to add that into the unused content page.

I don't think it's a problem to keep that in the wiki page. I've removed the Trim style that wasn't necessary since it was not even in-game.

Gabrielwoj (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2014 (PDT)

love and war weapon page reversions

the old wording was most certainly not better. it was overly lengthy and redundant in places, as well as being frankly poor in others. the back scatter page comes to mind - "It has the ability to deal mini-crit damage at close range while at the back of enemies, making it excel at ambushing tactics." i really don't see how that crudely constructed mess is superior to my masterfully crafted work of art. please reconsider your undoing of my edits, or at least explain to me why they weren't up to par. english is as much a language as it is a passion, and it really bothers me to see it misused this way. Applegallop (talk) 23:53, 1 July 2014 (PDT)