Template talk:Set
Contents
Header links
Why not link the item sets back to their stub on the set page? GJ 20:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- They already do link back to Item sets. -The Neotank (Talk)
00:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- The icon to the side does, but the header doesn't. I didn't even realize the icon to the side was a link. GJ 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets
We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. Balladofwindfishes 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Pro and Con templates
How about adding 
and 
icons to sets that have an on wearer effect? Like this:
| The Gas Jockey's Gear | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Effect |
|
So, what do you think? — written by K1LL at 10:22, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
It still is confusing for me the +- and -+ effects... so i'm against it. however if this reworded without actual - and + in the text i say this is a good idea. But effects are short and easy to read so i guess it's okay as it is now. TheDoctor 10:27, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
- Still, we use the icons for weapons Pros and Cons in their respective class page, see Pyro weapon's page. — written by K1LL at 10:31, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
- Support Doesn't do any harm. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 10:36, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
Pyromania Sets
I'm new and I'm trying to help get some of the pyromania pages up to speed. Is there anything that can be done to expedite the process of getting the set template up-to-date when the resources (models, etc.) become available? The Grand Karkasmolen 22:32, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
Main article optional
Can we make the main article optional, but have it be enabled by default? Like {{set|SetName|main=no}}. Currently on item set pages it looks wonky, a set page.
GrampaSwood (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Done — 