Talk:Item timeline

From Team Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 19:37, 24 December 2010 by Stbeecher (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

November 19, 2010

Team spirit and Companion Cube pins were also added. -= M-NINJA Burger Gib.png =- 20:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram tick.png Done. seb26 [talk] 20:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Should unreleased items really be listed? Because then we'd need to include the Jag and all that stuff. --CruelCow (talk) 22:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Technically, the Jag is still being planned to be released once attributes are applied to it. With that said, if it is added, would it remain in the timeline when its model was put in the game files, or when it was made obtainable?

119th Update

Mercenary , Soldier of Fortune and Grizzled Veteran were added. Later, in May 5, 2010 Patch, Primeval Warrior was added. Mozgoed 09:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram tick.png Done also. seb26 [talk] 09:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Mann-Co update

Since the "Team Sprit" tool is added, should all other tools + Mann Co. Supply Crate be added? BLUH 09:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram cross.png No thanks I originally created the page with just Weapons, Hats and Misc items. I expect democracy will win out and add Tools, etc. My only concern is the size of the page. So, i'll start the voting with a NO. But, wiki is for everyone, what do others think? (Please notice i have not undone the "teamspirit" entry before you cast stones) Nooch 17:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram tick.png Keep I was actually in the middle of adding the tools, like paint cans. They are technically items, I see no reason for their exclusion. The page is long as it is, a couple more items won't make a huge difference. User Moussekateer signature sprite.pngMoussekateer·talk 17:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram tick.png Keep What Moussekateer said. Also, Golden Wrench that isn't even obtainable is there, i don't see why the tools can't be in, with name tags and stuff. -- User Swordz Swordz.pngSwordzUser Swordz Swordz.png (talk | contribs) 17:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Crit-A-Cola

CaC was actually added the day before the 119th update, in the April 28th patch. I'm not skilled enough in table modifications to fix it, but it should be fixed. Balladofwindfishes 18:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram tick.png Done. Nooch 19:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Alternative table restyling

Class Item Type Item Icon Item Name Notes
April 29, 2008The Gold Rush Update
Leaderboard class medic.png
Medic
Weapon Blutsauger Blutsauger Also included in this update:
Kritzkrieg Kritzkrieg
Übersaw Übersaw
June 19, 2008The Pyro Update
Leaderboard class pyro.png
Pyro
Weapon Backburner Backburner Also included in this update:
Flare Gun Flare Gun
Axtinguisher Axtinguisher
August 19, 2008A Heavy Update
Leaderboard class heavy.png
Heavy
Weapon Natascha Natascha Also included in this update:
Sandvich Sandvich
Killing Gloves of Boxing Killing Gloves of Boxing

Thoughts?--Kid Of The Century 16:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Approve I would support this reorganization. For discussion, i'd prefer a variation slightly less complicated. Maybe just change Class field to Group field that could indicate either class or item type?
Group Item Icon Item Name Notes
April 29, 2008The Gold Rush Update
Leaderboard class medic.png
Medic
Blutsauger Blutsauger Also included in this update:
Kritzkrieg Kritzkrieg
Übersaw Übersaw
June 19, 2008The Pyro Update
Leaderboard class pyro.png
Pyro
Backburner Backburner Also included in this update:
Flare Gun Flare Gun
Axtinguisher Axtinguisher
August 19, 2008A Heavy Update
Leaderboard class heavy.png
Heavy
Natascha Natascha Also included in this update:
Sandvich Sandvich
Killing Gloves of Boxing Killing Gloves of Boxing
Anyone else have opinions about these changes? Nooch 18:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
For better readability, I wouldn't mix the classes with Item type. Maybe the best thing is scrapping the Item Type info entirely, and use you last vesion.--Kid Of The Century 01:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Do the first version with the item types, I like it a lot. seb26 [talk] 04:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Killing Floor Promotion

Should the title of the Foster's Facade and Stockbroker's Scarf section be "Killing Floor Promotion" or whatnot, in the same vein as the Poker Night Promotional update that released the Dealer's Visor? --Fragment of Nothing 03:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram tick.png Done Nooch 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Blank "Also Included in This Update" sections

Group Item Icon Item Name Notes
September 02, 2009Team Fortress 2 update
Hats Cheater's Lament Cheater's Lament Also included in this update:

Such as the above. It doesn't look very nice, especially since there's even a bullet point there with nothing following. Perhaps we could add "nothing" after the bullet? I also notice that some entries for promo items and the like have a small blurb relevant to it (e.g. "Added Bill's Hat for players who pre-ordered Left 4 Dead 2"), while others are blank, so I'll go through and add that kind of simple information to fill in some of the blanks. Zarokima 13:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

To be honest, I almost regret to have added facts not tied to items (maps, gamemodes). So, yes, feel free to update the notes with appropriate facts.--Kid Of The Century 17:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

"In total" section

I think it'd be cool to have an extra list in the 'Notes' cell for a summary of what was released in the particular update, like for example, the Sniper v. Spy update, it would look like this:

In total:

Obviously there's a point where it becomes stupid to list this for some of the smaller patches, however, for the larger ones that can be quite long I think a summary would suit. What do people think? seb26 [talk] 20:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Stock Items

Seeing as they're the only items in the game that aren't included here, couldn't the stock weapons appear as well? They could have a short section at the beginning where they are grouped together, labeled "Stock Weapons", their release date would be "Initial Release" and we could be done with it? Stbeecher 19:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)