Talk:Item quality distribution
Revision as of 13:55, 14 March 2011 by RJackson (talk | contribs) (Updated this pages talk page & mirrored it on Talk:Quality)
Possible unusual hats table
The Rimmed Raincatcher must be updated in this template to denote that it can exist with Unusual quality. This change was added as part of the Febuary 14, 2011 Patch. SnowCanary 17:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
IMHO, we needn't so small article. It will be appropriate to merge it with Quality. These articles have the same theme. - Grand-O-Rand 22:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Support You beat me there. Shock394 18:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)- Support Yeah, this merge proposal looks right to me Cthulhu1992 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support I agree. Zoon-li 18:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Why not. -- Nightbox (t s) 09:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- They already were merged with that article at one point however we decided to split them for a few reasons, one that there is likely going to be more lists like this made and another being that we document the qualities themselves there. Not the items that "can" have them, since any item in the game can technically have any other quality. -- Lagg
10:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC) - Support Go ahead and merge it. On it own it feels really lacking, and since the lists are hidden by default they won't be in the way within the quality article. Ailure 12:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- I just gave the reasons the lists aren't in the article itself anymore, and this was not one of them. However it is also a valid reason because assuming a person has JS (what allows the lists to be hidden) enabled by default is not always a good idea on a wiki. -- Lagg 13:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- I just gave the reasons the lists aren't in the article itself anymore, and this was not one of them. However it is also a valid reason because assuming a person has JS (what allows the lists to be hidden) enabled by default is not always a good idea on a wiki. -- Lagg
Done -
13:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The preceding discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
