Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hat Describing Contest"
m (→Winners: Added sig, don't mind me!) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::{{c|Support}}You should do it, it will make the place very tidy! – '''''[[User:Jeff Andonuts|<font color="#004F21">Jeff Andonuts</font>]]''[[File:User_Jeff_Andonuts_Signature.png | JEFF used Bottle Rocket!]]''' 01:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ::::{{c|Support}}You should do it, it will make the place very tidy! – '''''[[User:Jeff Andonuts|<font color="#004F21">Jeff Andonuts</font>]]''[[File:User_Jeff_Andonuts_Signature.png | JEFF used Bottle Rocket!]]''' 01:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::I guess one person can cover all the hats, although would be much quicker if multiple people contributed. Also: Should there be a section devoted to hats that did not receive a description? --[[User:Exiggah|Exiggah]] 01:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::I guess one person can cover all the hats, although would be much quicker if multiple people contributed. Also: Should there be a section devoted to hats that did not receive a description? --[[User:Exiggah|Exiggah]] 01:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::You could list descriptionless hats in the table with a note saying "This hat did not receive a description." or "This hat was not part of the contest.". Hats released after the contest should probably stay off the page. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] 01:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 11 November 2010
Winners
Should a list of winners be in this article? - LingoSalad 23:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent idea. Go for it. Try and make it as clean and clutter free. – Smashman (talk) 23:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- This give me an idea. Why don't we make like this?
| Winner | Item | Description |
|---|---|---|
| TheTwoTonHammer | 
|
You'll be batting a thousand (skulls in) when you don this red piece of plastic! |
| PrO-bOy | 
|
When drinking one radioactive beverage at a time is not enough. |
And stuff. -- OluapPlayer (t) 
23:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sexy as hell. Do it. -- En Ex (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I like. Moussekateer 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good! These people didn't really get any in-game recognition so it would be nice to have a place with all of their names. --
- (talk | contribs) -- 01:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
SupportYou should do it, it will make the place very tidy! – Jeff Andonuts
01:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I guess one person can cover all the hats, although would be much quicker if multiple people contributed. Also: Should there be a section devoted to hats that did not receive a description? --Exiggah 01:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- You could list descriptionless hats in the table with a note saying "This hat did not receive a description." or "This hat was not part of the contest.". Hats released after the contest should probably stay off the page. Toomai Glittershine 01:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I guess one person can cover all the hats, although would be much quicker if multiple people contributed. Also: Should there be a section devoted to hats that did not receive a description? --Exiggah 01:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sexy as hell. Do it. -- En Ex (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
