Difference between revisions of "Talk:Operation Holographic Harvest"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Approved Missions section title: - Created topic)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
Thanks! [[User:Epsilonal|Epsilonal]] ([[User talk:Epsilonal|talk]]) 07:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 
Thanks! [[User:Epsilonal|Epsilonal]] ([[User talk:Epsilonal|talk]]) 07:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 +
: So as a bit of background, "Approved" is there because they have to be approved by campaign judges, from a submission pool for that campaign, before they're allowed to be in the tour. I wanted to be sure that it was conveyed they were the ones that were selected - be it from a contest submission pool, or their publicly viewable forum boards, which are still in use today.
 +
 +
: However, I'm not against a small rework of the title, if you believe a different one may be better suited for a casual reader to understand. I wouldn't be opposed to any of your suggestions, if you feel they fit better than the word "approved," or just not having the word at all; my only stipulation would be that the text below it continue to mention that they were available during this specific event, since missions are often not reused after a tour is over. Maps are often reused with new missions, but missions themselves are always new ones. — [[File:User ThatHatGuy Signature Icon.png|30px|link=User:ThatHatGuy]] [[File:User ThatHatGuy Signature Talk.png|30px|link=User talk:ThatHatGuy]] [[File:User ThatHatGuy Signature Contribs.png|30px|link=Special:Contributions/ThatHatGuy]] 08:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:37, 7 November 2022

Approved Missions section title

Hey all, just a quick discussion. Currently the subheading being used on the different community MvM event pages is 'Approved Missions', I'm proposing a change to 'Approved Maps and Missions' (as almost all of the maps being used in these events are custom maps). Additionally, most of these custom maps were specifically created for and submitted to these events, so it stands to reason that they'd be as much of a part of it as the missions are.

Personally, I feel that 'approved' is probably a bit redundant (they're in the campaign, so therefore they must be approved anyway). We could use other prefixes such as:

  • Campaign Maps and Missions
  • Event Maps and Missions
  • Tour Maps and Missions
  • Operation Maps and Missions

But my personal preference is probably just simply:

  • Maps and Missions

Since it's the least clunky, and all the other prefixes are just as redundant (in my opinion).

Would welcome anybody else's feedback here, if people disagree I'm happy to leave it as is - it's a very minor thing anyway.

Thanks! Epsilonal (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

So as a bit of background, "Approved" is there because they have to be approved by campaign judges, from a submission pool for that campaign, before they're allowed to be in the tour. I wanted to be sure that it was conveyed they were the ones that were selected - be it from a contest submission pool, or their publicly viewable forum boards, which are still in use today.
However, I'm not against a small rework of the title, if you believe a different one may be better suited for a casual reader to understand. I wouldn't be opposed to any of your suggestions, if you feel they fit better than the word "approved," or just not having the word at all; my only stipulation would be that the text below it continue to mention that they were available during this specific event, since missions are often not reused after a tour is over. Maps are often reused with new missions, but missions themselves are always new ones. — User ThatHatGuy Signature Icon.png User ThatHatGuy Signature Talk.png User ThatHatGuy Signature Contribs.png 08:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)