|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Is there a reason this page has been full-protected? Seems kinda weird. [[User:Water Armpit|Water Armpit]] 04:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | | + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | Add to trivia that this also has jigglebones, the pom pom on the top bounces with movement. [[User:UrCa1988|UrCa1988]] 07:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| + | | arc1link = Talk:Napper's Respite/Archive 1 |
| − | | + | }} |
| − | ^sorry I think its my bad tell me how to fix and I gladly willRpR 10:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :WillRpR: Protecting / Unprotecting pages is a job that only Wiki staff can do. We were protecting pages until the basic structure of the page was in place, to ensure our formatting guidelines are adhered too. The page is unprotected now, you don't need to do anything. :) -[[User:RJackson|<span style="background-color:#FF0000;color:white;font-size:0.7em;padding: 0 2px;">RJ</span>]]{{mod}} 10:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | sorry for the general noobiness RpR 10:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Do we really need to say that it's paintable, seeing as a great many hats are, it seems a bit pointless to say it so specifically on this page. [[User:Discdeath|Discdeath]] 17:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Considering some hats aren't paintable, I think it's fair to say it should be mentioned. [[User:UrCa1988|UrCa1988]] 18:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : The list of hats that can be painted are listed [[Paint|here]] so it's not necessary at the moment, we may add that to the infobox --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :: Whoops, it's already been added --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | "With white paint this hat may seem pink in a very dark light"? I think that is just your eyes playing with you, and even then it doesn't seem too trivia worthy. Do we need it?
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Paint changes==
| |
| − | Has the way paint effects Napper's Respite changed for anyone else? I painted it white two days ago and it would be white with team-colored stripes. Now it's white with yellow stripes on either team. I'm quite disappointed. --[[User:CommodoreJim|CommodoreJim]] 00:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : Yes, some hats have changed. See [[October 6, 2010 Patch]] for details.-[[User:RJackson|<span style="background-color:#FF0000;color:white;font-size:0.7em;padding: 0 2px;">RJ</span>]]{{mod}} 00:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | It's not on that list of paint changes in the patch notes, though. --[[User:CommodoreJim|CommodoreJim]] 00:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Yeah, Valve tends to do that a lot. We got used to it. -- [[User:Vi3trice|<font color=#771d6d>'''Vi3trice'''</font>]] {{adm}} <sub>([[User_talk:Vi3trice|talk]])</sub> 01:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Name ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Anyone else think the name is a play on Rappers delight? -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] 19:16, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Has the way paint effects Napper's Respite
| |
