|
|
| (100 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Show Page as English ==
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | Does anyone know how to do this? I created this page, but it's not showing up as an English language page.[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]] 06:33, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | | + | | arc1link = Talk:Reskins/Archive 1 |
| − | :A bot updates that list, but it has done it now [[user:seb26|<small style="background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #0070FF;padding:0em 0.5em;color:#000;-webkit-box-shadow:2px 1px 1px #8BBEFF;">'''seb26'''</small>]] 15:20, 13 August 2011 (PDT)
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | == Category ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | This should really be a category rather than an article in its own right. In most cases, these aren't reskins, but alternate models. Maybe move it to Alternate Models? It just feels weird calling this article "reskin". --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 23:30, 16 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : Oh, it's already a category. Alright, I'mma just nominate this for deletion then. Opinions go here. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 23:32, 16 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::{{c|Oppose}} – page has more info than the category page and is more useful. As it provides this extra info it isn't a duplication or redundant. [[user:seb26|<small style="background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #0070FF;padding:0em 0.5em;color:#000;-webkit-box-shadow:2px 1px 1px #8BBEFF;">'''seb26'''</small>]] 23:50, 16 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::{{c|Oppose}}Why delete this page instead of the incomplete catagory page?[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]] 02:49, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::: Cause the only one that's actually a reskin is the Golden Wrench. --[[User:SilverHammer|SilverHammer]] 12:08, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::::: Um, I think you've got the definition of reskin wrong there. A reskin isn't a palate or colour swap. It means anything that has a visual, and possible sound, difference but has the same function. Everything on this list is a reskin. The original and holy macral are too really.[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]] 14:09, 17 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::{{c|Oppose}} - SilverHammer, I created the original category page (which has since been redirected to this page) because I felt that it only warranted a category and not a full article; however, MEDUNN took the work I did and improved upon it greatly with a table, item icons, and even additional notes about the reskinned items. I am convinced it should stay, as Valve will likely continue to release more reskinned items in future updates. [[User:ButteredToast|ButteredToast]] 10:14, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::{{c|info}} Just to note, by this definition of reskin the [[Shovel]], [[Fire Axe]], [[Bottle]], [[Fists]], [[Wrench]], [[Bonesaw]] and [[Kukri]] are all reskins of each other. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 10:46, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::::I think that calling the base weapons reskins of each other is about as useful as calling hats reskins of each other (save for the Polycount hats); after all, having a reskin requires some kind of prerequisite weapon, and all of these weapons are the first of their kind and were released at the same time. [[User:ButteredToast|ButteredToast]] 11:02, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | : {{c|Support}} Adding a pretty table to an article doesn't make it worth keeping. Suggest moving any non-table content to [[Category:Reskins]] and leave the "Notes" section to their respective articles. Basically, this "article" is just a list, which is EXACTLY what a Category: page is. [[User:Coreycubed|coreycubed]] / [[User talk:Coreycubed|talk]] 10:55, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Holy Mackerel and The Original ==
| |
| − | Can we have a vote to decide whether or not these are reskins or not. I would say yes as they share the fuction of two other weapons with only visual differences. I know some people say that the original's position makes it better as it's easier to aim, but I would say that that is still just a visual and not a functional change.[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]] 04:43, 21 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :I don't think that the Mackerel really counts as a reskin since it counts the number of hits that it makes in the killfeed notification, something no other weapon before it has done. As for the Original, I'm a little divided on the issue, but I think it counts as a reskin since it is functionally similar to the Rocket Launcher. [[User:ButteredToast|ButteredToast]] 10:14, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | ::The two weapons have different attributes attached, so from that perspective they are unique weapons. From a gameplay perspective the Holy Mackerel makes it easier to see when a team mate is being smacked about by a Scout, and the Original fires from a different position. If it fired from the bottom left of the screen would it still be considered equal to the rocket launcher? '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 10:19, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::The Holy Mackerel is not a reskin, since it also is part of a set that provides a bonus. That same set using the Bat instead wouldn't function, so therefore it has a mechanical property that the Bat does not, even discounting the kill feed notifications. Similarly, the Original fires from a different position on the screen, changing how a Soldier can use cover. This is also a different mechanical property, and as such is not a reskin but functionally a different weapon. ==[[User:FaxCelestis|Fax Celestis]] <sub>[[User_talk:FaxCelestis|talk]]</sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/FaxCelestis|contrib]]</small><sup>[http://wiki.faxcelestis.net/ home]</sup>
| |
| − | ::::What about the Saxxy and G. Wrench though? They have a unique attribute. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 10:30, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :::::I never included the Golden Wrench or Saxxy because reskins before, though the Saxxy does technically count as a reskin of the Golden Wrench since it duplicates the functionality of the Golden Wrench. [[User:ButteredToast|ButteredToast]] 10:39, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Trivia ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | *''Some hats were reskins of other hats before being added officially to the game.''
| |
| − | | |
| − | This line is debatable in my opinion. The easy way to add hats into the game unofficially is to overwrite the models of other hats. While this can be construed as 'reskinning', it is not usually the authors intention to reimagine the hat being overwritten. You can overwrite any hat. By this definition every class hat is a reskin of every other class hat (apart from the polycount hats) since they are functionally identical. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 10:27, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | :I have to agree with Mousekateer on this one; short of the Polycount hats which provided a bonus when the entire set is equipped, changing the models of the hats doesn't really count as reskinning. [[User:ButteredToast|ButteredToast]] 10:34, 22 August 2011 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Should we add a date added column? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Should we add a "date added" column?
| |
