Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki:Archived discussions/Template talk:Strange quality table"
m (I'm bad at this.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== List Festive items separately == | == List Festive items separately == | ||
| − | I believe the Festive weapons should be [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Strange_quality_table&diff=872763&oldid=872603 listed separately] from their non-festive counterparts. They are totally independent weapons (reskins) with unique defindex, names, descriptions, models, and attainability. They also have their own backpack icons that we would like to show on the wiki. For all intents and purposes, they're unique weapons. The only reason they don't have their own articles is because I haven't had time to make the articles yet. | + | I believe the Festive weapons should be [http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/index.php?title=Template:Strange_quality_table&diff=872763&oldid=872603 listed separately] from their non-festive counterparts. They are totally independent weapons (reskins) with unique defindex, names, descriptions, models, and attainability. They also have their own backpack icons that we would like to show on the wiki. For all intents and purposes, they're unique weapons. The only reason they don't have their own articles is because I haven't had time to make the articles yet. Thoughts? – [[User:Fashnek|<span style="text-size:1.5em;font-weight:bold;color:#363;text-shadow:0 0 0.8em #6c6;">fashnek</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Fashnek|talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fashnek|c]])</sub> 15:02, 16 December 2011 (PST) |
Revision as of 23:02, 16 December 2011
List Festive items separately
I believe the Festive weapons should be listed separately from their non-festive counterparts. They are totally independent weapons (reskins) with unique defindex, names, descriptions, models, and attainability. They also have their own backpack icons that we would like to show on the wiki. For all intents and purposes, they're unique weapons. The only reason they don't have their own articles is because I haven't had time to make the articles yet. Thoughts? – fashnek (talk·c) 15:02, 16 December 2011 (PST)
