|
|
| (143 intermediate revisions by 90 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[User:Crow T. Robot|Crow T. Robot]] 15:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | A question for those who currently have the means to do it. Is it possible to rebuild headgear for a specific class? I recently crafted for Soldier and got the Kabuto, which I am not particularly pleased with. Is it possible to rebuild headgear with a soldier tolken, or should I resign to my fate?
| + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | :No, sadly not. The only surefire hat craft currently is the Fabricate Bonk Helm blueprint, so you'll have to do a random craft and leave it to chance if you want a Soldier Hat, or build up another 4 refined metals and a token (the safest, but also most tedious option). [[User:Hackett|Hackett]] 15:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
| + | | arc1link = Talk:Crafting/Archive 1 |
| − | ::Save the hats you dislike for the supposedly upcoming trading feature. With any luck, it will be alongside the [[Engineer]] update. [[User:Infi^|Infi^]] 15:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | ==Portuguese available==
| |
| − | | |
| − | After lots of work, I finally translated THE WHOLE PAGE to Portuguese. Finally! --[[User:EpicEric|EpicEric]] 19:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :EpicEric is credit to team :3 — [[User:WindPower|WindPower]] 19:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Smelting Metal ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | While I'm aware that this may be considered a method for trying to get the Golden Wrench, is it really necessary to remove it? Likely, anyone who didn't already know about this recipe would not be continually doing this to try and get a Golden Wrench. There's no reason to be political about this, we're an information resource. --[[User:Firestorm|<font color=#FF6600><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></font>]] 21:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :It has been removed from the blueprints. You can't do it anymore. — [[User:WindPower|WindPower]] 21:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :: oh.. well don't I feel stupid? --[[User:Firestorm|<font color=#FF6600><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></font>]] 21:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::Yeah, that's why I removed it. I didn't remove it to be political. :3 -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 21:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | Still not re-enabled for some reason. [[User:Sam-1-14|Sam-1-14]] 01:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == "Smelt Value" ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Can someone explain this to me and a friend. It seems to make no sense whatsoever.
| |
| − | Thanks in advance. [[User:SenileOldFool|SenileOldFool]] 10:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :You're going to use up a lot of weapons when crafting, only to end up with less than you had to begin with unless you're crafting metal. Then again, if you craft a weapon or a hat from said metal, you'll lose more. It's basically net loss in terms of materials. It takes 8 weapons to make a class-specific one, but it's only worth 1... -- [[User:Vi3trice|<font color=#771d6d>'''Vi3trice'''</font>]] {{adm}} <sub>([[User_talk:Vi3trice|talk]])</sub> 10:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Gold, Silver, and Copper? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | While I was browsing through the backpack materials in GCFScape, I've noticed something interesting. In "materials/backpack/crafting", there seems to be three unused tokens. However, unlike the other tokens, they are simply circles with the names on them, which I don't understand why. [[User:AbeX300|AbeX300]] 22:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :They're old and scrapped. They've been there since crafting's release. Likely metal placeholders before they made the names and pictures. -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] {{bur}} <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 22:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Engineer Tokens ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Possible now, can we remove that note about Engineer Tokens. It's untrue. -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] {{bur}} <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 22:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == PDA2 Slot token... ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ...has gone bye-bye. http://www.tf2items.com/id/Smashman2004 {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 06:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I lost mine too :( But, I emailed Robin Walker and he has promised a token to replace it! Try emailing him. [[User:Vorless|Vorless]] 16:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Vita-Saw Blueprint ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | It seems that the Polycount Update weapons are a previous weapon of similar nature and a piece of Refined Metal. This raises the question, does the Ubersaw + Refined Metal produce a Vita-saw? Personally, I don't have any Refined metal to test the idea, but it sounds logical to me, so it might be worth a try. [[User:Jarimesce|Jarimesce]] 23:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : Nope, you can see the list [http://www.tf2items.com/crafting/blueprints.php here] of all crafting blueprints. And it's one reclaimed metal, not refined. --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 23:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :We would have heard by now, so no. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 23:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | There are recipes for KGB+refined=GRU and ubersaw+refined=vitasaw, but the section at the bottom also says:
| |
| − | "As of the Mann-Co update, all of the Polycount weapons are currently craftable, as listed above. However, the Heavy's Gloves of Running Urgently and the Medic's Vita-Saw are NOT craftable. "
| |
| − | Which is correct?
| |
| − | [[User:Crap|Crap]] 09:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Actually got a pair of kgb to test with and confirmed the GRU recipe does work.
| |
| − | Screenshot of the blueprints here:
| |
| − | [http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/5457/grurecipe.png]
| |
| − | [[User:Crap|Crap]] 13:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Interesting. They must gave added those last night. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 14:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Italian version added==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I just finished the translation of the Crafting page for the Italian section of the Wiki [[User:Cthulhu1992|Cthulhu1992]] 12:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Untradeable Items ==
| |
| − | It seems to me that we should state that if you craft an untradeable item, even with a tradeable item, the resulting item received will be untradeable. This goes for metal, too.
| |
| − | Another question: does smelting an untradeable reclaimed metal made out of a mix of tradeable and untradeable scrap result in returning the same amount of tradeable/untradeable scrap, or are they all untradeable? [[User:TheMedik|TheMedik]] 21:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Solved my own question. Upon crafting one untradeable scrap with two tradeable, and smelting the untradeable reclaimed, I received three untradeable scraps. Post in trivia? [[User:TheMedik|TheMedik]] 21:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | I just made edits to the final section referencing crafting of untradeable items. The previous version claimed that untradeable metals could be used to craft a final product (hat or weapon), and that item would be tradeable. Sadly, I just crafted a Milkman using post-Mann achievement weapons, and found out that this information was completely incorrect. Much to my dismay, I received a non-tradeable hat... an unfortunate waste of the tradeable metal used in the process. [[User:RukiTanuki|RukiTanuki]] 22:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::I'm adding more information to the untradeable crafting section. From my own experience and several forum posts (a few posts down on [[http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1530377&page=2]] and [[http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?p=17944870&posted=1#post17944870]] for example), crafted untradeable items revert to tradeable in about 2 days. [[User:RukiTanuki|RukiTanuki]] 15:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Rocket Jumper ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | As of now, there currently is not a recipe for this weapon, correct? However, I'm slightly curious, as the Token Table doesn't show the Rocket Jumper as being recognized as a "Primary" weapon. Should this be added, or has anyone confirmed A) If a recipe exists or B) If a "craftable" Rocket Jumper can be received by using a Primary + Soldier + Scrap recipe? -[[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 03:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : It can be crafted, as seen [http://www.tf2items.com/crafting/blueprints.php here], updating the page now. --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 03:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :: Serves me right for not reading your whole post. I don't know if it counts as a primary, my guess would be yes. It can also drop randomly in game --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 03:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == A minor suggestion ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ''† The Batter's Helmet's level and vintage status is not retained when crafted into a Bonk Helm. The level will be randomized.''
| |
| − | If an unusual Batter's Helmet is valid for this crafting recipe, and the Bonk Helm produced is not unusual, could we change this to say something along the lines of '...level and prefix are not retained...'? Just a thought.
| |
| − | :If we're going to do that, minus well use [[rarity]] as it's the official term.[[User:TheMedik|TheMedik]] 02:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Cleanup tag ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Is this needed anymore? If so, what else is required for this page? --[[User:Vaught|Vaught]] 23:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Hmm, we use the weapons' names on the top, but the icons at the Crafting weapon classifications. Maybe make that consistent? --[[User:CruelCow|CruelCow]] 19:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
| |
