User talk:BrazilianNut/2020

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

:D XD

ola! BrazlianNut! I'm very glad to talk to you that Korean Translation Team determined you are a suitable prospective awardee of a honorary translator!
Will you accept the title of Honorary Translator of Korean Translation Team? ;)
123rse (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, 123rse.

I would be, well, honored. =) - BrazilianNut (talk) 15:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

for the Honorary translator

first of all, I like to extend my heartful congratuation to you

and I was so happy when you thanks to me about your nomination. :D

You made a great dedication on korean pages which deserves respect and should be remembered

So, as the one way to celebrate your contribution,

I award the title of the Honorary Translator to you on behalf of the korean team.

Congratuation and thank you very much. :)

Certificate of Honorary translator

This user is an Honorary Translator of the Korean Translation Team!

123rse (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

You are faster than bullets

Timmy is a newcomer in Chinese translation team, when I about to start my corrections and help, I find your movement faster than me.

Many thanks for your caring :D

14:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

=P

BrazilianNut (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Glossário

Olá!

Recentemente atualizei o glossário e as diretrizes de tradução (e coloquei um aviso bem grande ao editar as páginas), mas parece que você ainda está cometendo alguns errinhos bobos que eu adoraria que fossem evitados a qualquer custo (como traduzir "show" como "mostrar" e usar "completar" no lugar de "cumprir"). Por favor, certifique-se de seguir o guia de tradução atualizado sempre que for editar alguma página de agora em diante.

Obrigado~ — Tark lm(pt-br) 19:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Tentarei me lembrar. Lamento por qualquer inconveniência. - BrazilianNut (talk) 09:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

A thank you!

Wikichievement	Awarded by	Reason
Helping Hand Help other users to improve the Team Fortress Wiki with constant tips and coordination.	jan	Wikichievement unlocked! Thank you for always helping me out with everything, nuff said!

Seriously though, thank you for all the things you've helped me in the few last days, I really appreciate it:) // Jan (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

❤ - BrazilianNut (talk) 15:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Globetrotter "bug"

Not sure if it's a real bug. The texture for the second style has the RED building for both teams. It would be considered a bug if in the texture the building was BLU, but for some reason in-game was the RED building: https://imgur.com/a/9a6xh0Q - ▪ - 21:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Weird, but ok...

If you want to rename the section to "Notes", remove it or whatever, go ahead. - BrazilianNut (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

I think I'll keep as is for now, though other users may want to express their opinions below. I checked the Workshop images and the building was BLU on the Dust style, either the creator did a mistake when importing the item to the Workshop or Valve somehow messed up. - ▪ - 22:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

"Availability: Halloween Package" on other pages.

Hi, I saw your edit on the Bat Outta Hell and I went to check the Wings of Purity page and noticed that there's no "Halloween Package" as an availability for it, despite 2014 Halloween items can be granted from it. Should we add it to all 2010-2014 Halloween items? - ▪ - 21:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Be my guest. =) - BrazilianNut (talk) 22:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Alright then, I guess I'll start doing that tomorrow. I wonder if I'll get close to my 20k edits goal by doing that. - ▪ - 22:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

EDIT: Before I start mass-editing pages, I have one question. Should we remove "Purchase" from the availability? I remember you (or someone else) told someone that these are no longer valid. - ▪ - 22:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

I don't think we should remove halloween-purchase following the same logic of promotional items that can no longer be obtained; instead, we should change the tooltip's text to say how it used to be purchasable during Halloween events but not anymore. That, however, is a bigger issue that should be discussed elsewhere, not in some user's talk page. - BrazilianNut (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, anyway, every page that has "halloween-purchase" is based on a template, so it can be easily modified by just editing the main template and not every page. So I'll be starting adding the "Halloween Package" regardless of that. - ▪ - 23:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

I was about to start doing the edits today, but I noticed something on the Halloween Masks page, and how Halloween Transmute is on the Availability. I think all items that you receive from the Package is also available on the Transmuting, however I'm not sure. The page for the Halloween Transmute states that the person will receive a "random previous Scream Fortress event", but I think this is incorrect. Can you confirm that all items from the Package are the same items that can be found via Transmuting? Thanks. - ▪ - 19:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

I can confirm that Packages and Transmutes give random items from old Scream Fortress events; I can't confirm nor deny that their item pools are the same. I am pretty sure they are, but I'm not 100% sure. - BrazilianNut (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Atualizações

Olá.

Eu estou planejando mudar a forma que escrevemos as notas de atualização aqui na wiki para seguir o estilo oficial (CS:GO, Dota 2, Artifact, etc.).

Como você é o único tradutor ativo, eu gostaria de perguntar diretamente se você teria algo contra usar esse formato de agora em diante. — Tark lm(pt-br) 00:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Oi, Tark.

Problema com esse formato eu não tenho; meu problema será lembrar-me de usá-lo. :V - BrazilianNut (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Beleza então, vou mover isso para o namespace principal. Também vou ter que me adaptar um pouco já que o estilo da wiki é bem mais simples e "direto", mas se precisar de ajuda ou tiver alguma dúvida é só falar.

Só avisando que essa não é uma mudança retroativa, não faz muito sentido arrumar trocentas páginas não recebem tráfego, mas eu sugiro começar por essa última atualização em junho caso queira atualizar as páginas antigas também. — Tark lm(pt-br) 01:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent changes

Hey BrazilianNut, I have a few things I want to comment on regarding your changes to /da since that is the language I (occasionaly) translate for:

While I appreciate the work you put into putting a lot of old pages up to date for all languages alike I got to ask you to stop doing major changes to a language you do not even speak. Small mistakes here and there aside, the most prominent issue on my mind is that you removed all the articles from our cosmetic names. We had a good reason to keep them that way (which we already decided on years ago) and here is why:

The reason why the prefix system works great for English is because the article does not change the adjectives in the word; there is no difference between "a big elephant" and "the big elephant" beside the article of choice (indefinite or definite). Danish does not work like this. Our adjectives conjugate with our articles so we decided that we were gonna keep the articles anyways because if you use 'item name' and 'item link' it would not make sense without them anyways (so just more work for us having to add "den" and "det" all over the place manually) and even when an indefinite is used in the original text we would not be able to use them in our language since the adjective is conjugated wrongly anyways when using the item name and item link commands. Therefore we have gotten around this by other means, but it has not caused any problems.

What I am trying to say is, you removing those articles only created more hassle for us: the translators of the language.

Please go back and add all those articles you removed and do the same for the pages you changed. Thank you.

Faghetti V.2 (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

It is undone.

I am incredibly sorry.

- BrazilianNut (talk) 23:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

No hard feelings :) the rest of the changes are still fine so keep up the good work. I think the same article things apply for /no and /sv, but I cannot say for the rest. You should probably ask some people from the other translation teams just to be sure.

Happy updating.

Faghetti V.2 (talk) 07:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, BrazilianNut

Greetings, BrazilianNut. Dereko just came here to say thanks to you for updating item set pages.

Wish you good cheer.

08:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks; cheers to you, too. =) - BrazilianNut (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there!

I noticed that you've edited those Item set pages, expecially the basic descriptions. The thing that bothers me a lot recently is about the interface, maybe called the aesthetic measure. The pages now add contribution information, {{Halloween restricted|set}} or some other short information under the {{set|item set name|main=no}}, it may be much simpler compared with the old edition, but the empty space is a little weird here, since there's no empty space between the Update history and XXX patch just under it. So it's just a bit uncomfortable looking from the whole page. I wonder if we could have some other ways to make those item set pages more...nice XD (not good at English, I'm sorry...)Hagi (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Hagi.

I added that extra space between {{set|item set name|main=no}} and the additional information because I felt the text after the table was too close to it. If it is bothering you, feel free to remove it.

Cheers - BrazilianNut (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes I also felt that without the extra space the room between the table and information below are too close...Well it may be just ok, thanks for the reply and cheers to you too:)Hagi (talk) 07:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Marking pages for deletion

Heyo,

I've noticed that you often don't specify a reason when marking a page for deletion. An example of this occurance being this edit, in which you mark a language subpage for deletion without providing a reason, where none of us speak the language in question.

I'm sure you can see why this is an issue, as it is uncertain as to why that page be deleted, leaving it in queue for longer than it needs to be, or the request be declined entirely.

As already stated on Template:Delete, users must specify a reason for the deletion, so please make sure to do that henceforth. Thanks  Wookipan (talk | contribs) 19:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I'll do my best to remember it next time.

Cheers. - BrazilianNut (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)