|
|
| (138 intermediate revisions by 60 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Delete this page ==
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | | + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | This is unreleased content, it can't have it's own page. {{unsigned|TheScoot}}
| + | | arc1link = Talk:Team Fortress 2 Beta/Archive 1 |
| − | : Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> --[[User:Picard|Picard]] {{loc|de}} 14:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | == Citations ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Well, it was not KritzKast first. First was [http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/08/19/interview-valve-on-the-future-of-team-fortress-2/ PC Gamer's interview]. [[User:Holek|Holek]] 20:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :AHA! I knew I'd heard it somewhere else first.--[[User:Focusknock|Focusknock]] 20:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :But they didn't mention it was open. — [[User:WindPower|<span style="font-weight:bold;">Wind</span>]] {{adm}} 20:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::Yes, they did:
| |
| − | :::''PC Gamer: Are there any class updates that you’ve done that you feel you need to revisit?''
| |
| − | :::''Robin Walker:'' (...) ''There are systems in the game that are tuned to specific numbers. The amount of damage the sniper rifle does fully charged, for instance. On a headshot it’s specifically tuned to the health of the other class, so there would be damage numbers we’d need to change. It’s hard for us to run that test and get good data, so, '''we’re probably going to gear up the TF2 public beta again soon and make it publicly available to everyone who owns TF.''' We’ll start running some more wide scale experiments there.''
| |
| − | ::[[User:Holek|Holek]] 20:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::::/me fails D: — [[User:WindPower|<span style="font-weight:bold;">Wind</span>]] {{adm}} 20:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | hey its ep 82 not 88 {{unsigned|Madsser}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | Any reason the link to KK keeps getting deleted? If it's a case of not being able to qualify our source, well that's something we're not prepared to do. We promised annominity to He/She/It. But we will be proven correct on it [[User:Agro|Agro]] 22:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : As far as I heard on the Podcast, it was just "very soon". We can't really put something here that isn't verifiable, so "soon" will have to suffice until any further announcement about a launch date. Not saying you're wrong, and not trying to be difficult, just that if it's not verifiable, it can't really pass as wiki content. -- [[User:Nineaxis|<span style="color:#FF8C00;font-weight:bold">Nineaxis</span>]] {{mod}} [[File:User Nineaxis sig duck.png|12px]] 22:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
